Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: SWR Bridges

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: SWR Bridges
From: "Steve" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:12:00 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20150330; t=1478110319; bh=sr36SGj0efV8GV0yJJSHRR9q5FQFsQo3pVkMjk+ej6A=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=fF76hkClzMITdlNKDuQgiOf/AEU88IcjWA7JtyyNFKV0fafODYRvzPVDKOmGC6g0g 90JcCLYL2+yK6/jFeV02h4ytBS37UVj8YAnrABEmNTmI1fkrjSVot6tM4NBE3wlnxV SeFjrAFDqPim1ZbCRrUXOxJp57OswaWes2DsY8e9WVxzy4JvzUdFKNXGRiQ1Z4Htws SfE5jT6hB8ouMz5pwlXJToteMfgmTh38AsmB8BLrv35HUOiqnP6+ToSCIA4EQKuyju oqCdyO1g+27q8cUoh/V3FiFdgs1ugCCM+PBH2K/om8IeIjpyNE9dVT5VdedEzU0Op6 y1IUwL0HQXP/g==
In-reply-to: <BF2A660B66FF48C8A46E2A9074342590@PCPMF>
References: <B41D1E733CED41EC80C152AE9123A8D0@PCPMF> <CAOe7CM72MviUh=Psd4iHXSU+Sn3nTqOk4xZFepu-8yVm4eWERA@mail.gmail.com> <F52C8033364040399F0972E026B40F21@StevePC> <BF2A660B66FF48C8A46E2A9074342590@PCPMF>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Many thanks to all of those taking the time to reply to my inquiry. It seems that results vary depending upon what meter is being used but it sounds as though only a few are having reliable / accurate results. I normally use the scope match and call it the 'most valuable piece of gear in my shack' but was curious about suggesting the use of an HF SWR bridge for those that do not yet have such a thing, and if it would be a reliable method of matching an antenna. In some cases 'yes', but it seems, in most cases, may be unreliable and only lead to confusion.


Steve  73



WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook":  http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl

VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves": http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>