Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ULF: 7.9 km distance on the 101 km band

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ULF: 7.9 km distance on the 101 km band
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:38:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAA8k23TGuNuOZcnJA42=EDxZgHMAVNeq9SM7=UhvTz6Noqa_FA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
PS: Another spectrogram: It is even visible in 3.8 mHz: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/ULF_7.9km_3.8mHz.png

Am 11.07.2016 23:36, schrieb DK7FC:
Hi all,

Today i woke up early in the morning, 05:00 AM, drunk a coffee and drove on the hill where i intended to receive my own 100 nW ERP ULF signal in a distance of 7.9 km. This is the path and locations: http://no.nonsense.ee/qth/map.html?qth=JN49JL01LT&from=JN49IK00WD The first time i used the portable stereo recorder with PPS+NMEA on the right channel. 130 minutes were recorded. The receive antenna was an active E field antenna, modified for ULF reception. The RX location is a tower on a hill, 570m ASL. The antenna was mounted in about 35m AGL. The tower is quite distant from the city and villages but there is electricity, so the QRM / mains hum was terrible!
A first spectrogram shwing the unfiltered signal over the recording time:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/ULF_Teltschikturm_wide_unfiltered.png When applying Paul's hum filter (implemented in SpecLab) it looks MUCH better: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/ULF_Teltschikturm_wide_humfil.png Concentrated arround the interesting range: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/ULF_Teltschikturm_1k-5k_humfil.png

Then a band pass filter and NB was applied to generate narrow band spectrograms. Considering the strong mains hum i didn't expect much BUT, i've got a very clear peak in 424 uHz: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/ULF_Teltschikturm_424uHz_NB_humfil.png The average SNR is about 15 dB, the best peak was at 20 dB SNR, much more than i expected. Now, 7.9 km is the best distance so far on the 101 km band. That's 49% of the far field border distance.

The nice SNR makes me optimistic to see the signal in the far field. A next step should be a distance of about 17 km. It still looks like i am not band noise limited on the RX side, so maybe there can be an improvement of a few dB. Also i am planning to try a loop in the next test. Preparations will be done in a few minutes :-) The idea is to use a 4 turn 40m circumference (slightly) resonated loop...

Certainly it would be better to show a somewhat modulated signal to get a better proof that it's actually my signal, however i am still waiting for a significant peak on Paul's RX site, so i don't want to interrupt the transmission (15 days now). I checked other frequencies like 2971 and 2969 Hz, didn't find a stable signal, so there is no cross-talk from the PPS signal.

73, Stefan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>