To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done! |
From: | Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 16 May 2016 11:20:02 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMFjj71q9jJDHLvgtYJJ4EqK9=9w8zoLTucq6i6BgnP1i4ruUw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMFjj70zAo+NvzX4ZTj_DbiL2rx6NNq-ZzrVAnHiT1Mar9APPQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 |
Hi Tom, you wrote: > So did Stefan by using an 8-formed winding for the DC excitation!Ah, i see.. thanks, I missed that on the photo ... so there won't be kilovolts of AC on the DC exciation coil. Or, depending on how the ring core is oriented in the "mostly air core" coil, the AC flux lines would run perpendicular to the DC flux, which also eliminate the need for a large AC-blocking coil for the DC exciation. All the best, Wolf . |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done!, DK1IS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done!, DK1IS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done!, DK1IS |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done!, DK1IS |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |