To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 1 Apr 2016 05:59:19 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1459504760; bh=YlMfnwpijPK5ZKn7JQG9IzwZz3wz8RkjwB6I8bGnipY=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FBWTAprA0fOGr6YAJJugY6EzwsZWyGg64LG5crr3MmGtlMprA8/RCTGBQB3pmS1rr zK9YMSbdBhDS5+2cEoZqFXGBxXD+g4AwomPu3UrPdBAIM3mf52IRsfppnhEpjCNHmQ Ih2HelF/9WYkNgJolz/nsp/xOy6ibW04wF1uTTNM= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Uwe,
unfortunately static level was high, preventing your carriers before and after the PSK from showing up in my spectrogram. The EbNaut decoder produced "GL" at rank 13429 and -1 dB Eb/N0, but I have no clue whether this message is really correct.
Best 73,
Markus
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Do, 31 Mrz 2016 9:23 pm Betreff: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz Thanks Uwe. The late evening may not be ideal in terms of QRN background but let's try anyway. I have pushed out the antenna again (half height due to wind), and restarted the VLF grabbers with EbNaut recording since19 UT. 8270.000 is still within EbNaut's bandwidth (+-1/40 Hz) of your QRG so I hope that my new VLF neighbour Roland won't fire up tonight.
All the best,
Markus (DF6NM)
Von: uwe-jannsen <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Do, 31 Mrz 2016 6:38 pm Betreff: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz the carrier is on the air.
there will be a special message for Markus: start 22:00:00
coding 8K19A
CRC 16
period 40
length 2
duration 04:05:20:00
Have funUwe/dj8wx PS. rain would stop the transmission automatically. Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Gesendet: 24.03.2016 00:00 An: <[email protected]> Betreff: VLF: 8270 March 22 Yesterday afternoon the noise was fairly moderate, and around 18 UT I caught a good dash in 63 uHz, presumably from DJ8WX. I then attempted simulated EbNaut decodes on the carrier, using 1 and 2 character settings and 40 s symbols. Both resulted in valid asterisk messages, with some more margin to spare for the single character. So far I have never decoded a real message on VLF, and I'd be keen to try...
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
04010012_result.png |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz - 4*10=160, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | AW: Re: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen |
Previous by Thread: | RE: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz - 4*10=160, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |