To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz - 4*10=160 |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 1 Apr 2016 03:49:59 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1459496999; bh=kv52pVRzmcN0Tj7JT+YwKpIMMUdujmZOkgnMBbu/7Ho=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Lkz3ooGFMi1iBnti64nXGfiJDvdyRDV7ErZQxGssz9riHkLlJUgKKPJO8u6AyEv7L uIWMg8TP9A14QzMMOhKAZmVRyQj5rvdqtpTDJrtzSuEpctBPkZMhQkWsAEJZWDWfj7 ft/p9Nf54aIY7ANA8fHoXqOLe5KsvSlTozPneC9U= |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Laurence,
now that we learnt how to transmit with absolute phase, couldn't we join forces? There are currently three occasionally active low-power VLF stations in Europe, and hopefully Stefan will join in soon with the small yoghurt coil. Adding four 10 uW signals coherently could increase the signal by 12 dB, i.e. result in 160 uW ERP in the main lobe of the array. We could ask Paul to first measure our phases individually for calibration, and then do some distance-difference calculations involving LWPC to focus on your receiver in Alaska.
Best 73,
Markus
Von: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Fr, 1 Apr 2016 7:25 am Betreff: RE: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Laurence KL7 L |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz - 4*10=160, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |