To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:10:46 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1457007048; bh=3Rv5ITUPSrctxFpXAYWscTDu/adIz8KEf1WVtC1clHI=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JeQAY13YDSqApTc9/Rt+A3JgOYx0w8Pw7LAxXKc13A95RAb8VmsOKLJkCvXZPky7U jcqeCtImGIB9DAFsIEA1xzd62Pl267Up5XFFfWprrd9NCnktqbEHmwS05pNfvXwypO 3BSVard1KBlJVD5Bgx0RaQmBwhwm6DeCHsjEgBV4= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Joe, last night propagation between us was unusally stable and very strong until ~ 5 UT: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/opds8.png The FFT bandwidth had been halved to increase the aquisition time for your longer transmissions. "G. MARCONI" VO1NA, 477700Hz, 4K19A, 10char, 752*2s Wed/Thu 2016-03-02/03 start car. sym. offs. UT dB dB mHz 23:30 11.9 7.9 0 00:00 12.9 10.0 -1.5 00:30 16.1 13.6 -1.5 01:00 11.6 8.3 -1 01:30 16.9 14.2 -0.6 02:00 10.7 8.3 -0.6 02:30 17.9 14.4 -0.6 03:00 14.1 10.8 -0.6 03:30 5.7 4.4 -0.8 04:00 5.2 5.1 -0.8 04:30 3.6 4.0 -0.8 Compared to yesterday, I think the much larger SNR is mostly due to more stable phase rather than longer symbols. I found that still had to individually tweak the frequency offset in small steps, starting EbNaut several times and watching the decode quality after the first linear-phase trials, as well as the dots in the rawsyms phase plot. Generally on MF shorter much shorter symbols may be preferable. I believe that for such coherent and un-referenced signaling, there should be an optimum total message duration which is related to the inverse of the propagational Doppler spread. If that is typically 10 or 20 mHz, only a couple of minutes may be best. Hope that Domenico may have been able to break our distance record. Using phonons instead of photons might be too much of a challenge though ;-) Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: jcraig <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mi, 2 Mrz 2016 11:43 pm Betreff: Re: LF: MF: EbNaut to put your ideas into practice. I feel bad for making Paul's record so short lived, but very grateful for his software and guidance. Well lets go for 2 seoond symbols tonight and hope that enough phonons will reach Italy tonight. 73 and many thanks Markus and Paul Joe On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Markus Vester wrote: > Joe, > > > you've made it! Despite significant propagational spread, your message "G. MARCONI" was successfully decoded six times in Nuernberg. > > > Wed. 2016-03-02 > start car. sym. offs. > UT dB dB mHz > 00:00 2.5 1.6 -3 > 00:30 2.2 0.8 0 > 01:00 2.1 0.8 -2 > 01:30 0.8 0.0 -1 > 02:00 nil 0 > 02:30 nil 0 > 03:00 3.3 2.5 -1 > 03:30 3.4 3.0 -1 > 04:00 nil +1 > 04:30 nil 0 > > > Thank you for your photons, and for your patience! > > > All the best, > Markus (DF6NM) > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: jcraig <[email protected]> > An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> > Verschickt: Di, 1 Mrz 2016 8:45 pm > Betreff: Re: LF: MF: EbNaut > > > Well Done! > > The photon flux is on: 477.7 kHz, EbNaut parameters as before > (10 chars 8K19A 752 1-second symbols starting on the half hours UT) > Hope you have better luck if you want to try again, Markus. > > 73 > Joe VO1NA > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Markus Vester wrote: > >> Congratulations to Paul and Domenico, this is a well deserved cup of tea! >> >>> Maybe that is the farthest EbNaut on MF so far? >> I think so. Actually the other day I had tried hard to decode VO1NA here, but never managed to pull enough of Joe's photons out of the noise. >> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | AW: Re: LF: 8270Hz/dk7fc, uwe-jannsen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut, Roelof Bakker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut, Roelof Bakker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |