Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777

from [Johan Bodin] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777
From: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:35:59 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23T4-DLQX1Vh6HA9A_H6M0oThZHKr3RSJBMFXx7jC40fpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23T4-DLQX1Vh6HA9A_H6M0oThZHKr3RSJBMFXx7jC40fpw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
I did, but was too lazy to write a comment. After all the answer 121uOhm was correct :-) 

Andy Talbot wrote:
SO..... How come no one else spotted the equation worked out incorrectly :-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: RE: G3KEV, mal hamilton
Next by Date:  LF: Class E PA design, Andy Talbot
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777, Andy Talbot
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777, Markus Vester
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]