To: | Alan Melia <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Is a capacative top hat only as good as its lowest point? |
From: | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:26:41 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <A7B399DC39DB41E7A30B7F94EFF87E4E@gnat> |
Organization: | Gatesgarth Developments |
References: | <[email protected]> <A7B399DC39DB41E7A30B7F94EFF87E4E@gnat> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Alan, Wednesday, November 25, 2015 > Hi Chris I think any raising of the top-wire (loop) will increase the the > vertical component slightly and the ERP is proportional to effective height > squared. It also looks less obtrusive if higher :-)) It is cheaper ERP than > watts :-)) > Alan > G3NYK Thank you Alan, once again. Sorry for the late reply, work is my excuse! Where do the hours go? -- Best regards, Chris 2E0ILY mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777, Wolfgang Büscher |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Is a capacative top hat only as good as its lowest point?, Alan Melia |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |