To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3 |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:30:42 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1448479842; bh=531SRrUthJxaeITc+7J2hPRXdp0eilOma+BM5iTFI+U=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tEqRCkjo6fRNemsxo7IGKE/UI8AEeUssdPZxGfp2KDhD0SfIj5AlmxYsZ2ZC8Sb5G V42Y4TRk0n+h0ez7mJhwQ98SC0jUXPOL97IzH1qkRxcRWrwycI5tfT+cQ18cJCOG/A MQC17xXTk4RipT43DM4kJFzPSC3YtM/NvCqD82LM= |
In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23R+Q-4zD50pXGZ5XMEdM7rnFvp844f_nUAuKMfuAs+2PQ@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAA8k23R+Q-4zD50pXGZ5XMEdM7rnFvp844f_nUAuKMfuAs+2PQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Andy,
maybe you're right, see also Planck's formula
E = h f.
But then, maybe not - consider radiated power from a given antenna height and current
Prad = i^2 * 1579 ohm * (h / lambda)^2
which clearly scales with f^2.
So, in the essence of it's innermost being, "Frequency" remains a mystery ;-)
Best 73,
Markus
Von: Andy Talbot <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mi, 25 Nov 2015 6:32 pm Betreff: Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3 Moving to 496.4Hz now ?
Frequency expressed in dB has to take the 10.LOG form, not 20.LOG
Consider P = kTB
'jnt
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |