Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3
From: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:30:42 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1448479842; bh=531SRrUthJxaeITc+7J2hPRXdp0eilOma+BM5iTFI+U=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tEqRCkjo6fRNemsxo7IGKE/UI8AEeUssdPZxGfp2KDhD0SfIj5AlmxYsZ2ZC8Sb5G V42Y4TRk0n+h0ez7mJhwQ98SC0jUXPOL97IzH1qkRxcRWrwycI5tfT+cQ18cJCOG/A MQC17xXTk4RipT43DM4kJFzPSC3YtM/NvCqD82LM=
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23R+Q-4zD50pXGZ5XMEdM7rnFvp844f_nUAuKMfuAs+2PQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA8k23R+Q-4zD50pXGZ5XMEdM7rnFvp844f_nUAuKMfuAs+2PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Andy,
 
maybe you're right, see also Planck's formula
 E = h f.
 
But then, maybe not - consider radiated power from a given antenna height and current
 Prad = i^2 * 1579 ohm * (h / lambda)^2
which clearly scales with f^2.
 
So, in the essence of it's innermost being, "Frequency" remains a mystery ;-)
Best 73,
Markus

 
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Mi, 25 Nov 2015 6:32 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: EbNaut and The Cat / Take 3

Moving to 496.4Hz now ?

Frequency expressed in dB has to take the 10.LOG form, not 20.LOG

Consider P = kTB  

'jnt



Thanks also from here to all participants (feline and human)! Next step - reduce frequency by 24.4334 dB?
 
All the best,
Markus (DF6NM)

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>