Hi Graham and all,
I do not know if it is possible and I do not know if Opera use the same decoding sistem of JT65 but
for you it is possible that a ham receive some qsl card for 144 MHz EME qso in JT65
when in his life
he never
made a QSO via EME
in 144 MHz.
Permit me
some doubt about these
"deep search" systems.
It seems very
similar to those that make
QSOs with callbbok.
As you can see
I do not like the
digital modes because I want to be
a fun to
make a QSO and not my
computer.
A digital
QSO is a little
how to send an SMS to
a pretty girl instead of
taking her out to dinner.
Ok for the importance
of automated systems
for understanding the propagation
but when it is determined
that
for a direction it is possible
a QSO with traditional systems
why do not make a real
QSO?
Every day
when I read the
email I see dozens and
dozens of WSPR reports,
dozens and dozens of OPERA reports...
I rarely see
a report of a
real QSO,dozens and
dozens of computers that work
all night while operators are sleeping.
Maybe I'm a
purist as says
Luis but honestly the satisfaction of a CW
QSO made by me and my
key between the fingers,
although I am a
average operator,
is unmatched.
Maybe
I'll never make a
MF QSO with the US
or Australia but I think
that if on the other side
there is a well-equipped
station
is not impossible.
Take the example
of EA5DOM,
yesterday for the first time used the
CW on 630m,
does not seem to have had
many
difficulties
to make QSOs
at distances similar
to the WSPR reports that
has received so far.
Please forgive me,
but this morning I woke up so
...
73, Fausto IK4NMF
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: FR5ZX on MF WSPR
''Not considered "real" decodes by the purists and so, garbaje qualifyed''
So the belief structure is .
''Its possible for two stations to randomly detect the same station call sign at exactly the same time''
