|
Hi Graham and all,
I do not know if it is possible and I do not know
if Opera use the same decoding sistem of JT65 but
for you it is possible that a ham receive some qsl
card for 144 MHz EME qso in JT65 when in
his life
he never made a QSO via EME in 144 MHz.
Permit me some
doubt about these "deep search" systems.
It
seems very similar to those that
make QSOs with callbbok.
As you can see I do not like the digital modes because I want to be a fun to make a QSO and not
my computer.
A digital QSO is a little
how to send an SMS to
a pretty girl instead of taking her out to dinner.
Ok for the
importance of automated
systems for understanding
the propagation but when it
is determined
that for a
direction it is possible a
QSO with traditional systems why do not make a real QSO?
Every day
when I read the email I see dozens
and dozens of WSPR reports, dozens and dozens
of OPERA reports...
I rarely
see a report of a real QSO,dozens and dozens of computers that
work all night while operators are
sleeping.
Maybe I'm a purist as says Luis but
honestly the satisfaction of a CW QSO made by me and my key between the
fingers,
although I am a average operator, is unmatched.
Maybe I'll never
make a MF QSO with the US or Australia but I
think that if on the other
side there is a well-equipped
station is
not impossible.
Take the example of EA5DOM, yesterday for the first time used the CW on
630m, does not seem
to have had many
difficulties to make QSOs
at distances similar to the WSPR reports that has received so far.
Please
forgive me, but this morning I woke
up so ...
73, Fausto IK4NMF
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 7:48
PM
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: FR5ZX on MF
WSPR
''Not considered "real" decodes by the purists
and so, garbaje qualifyed''
So the belief structure
is .
''Its possible for two
stations to randomly detect the same
station call sign at exactly the
same time''
| 