Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:20:58 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Chris,I would use an isolating transformer even if Z would be R = 50 Ohm. Also this allows you to improve the ground further :-) 73, Stefan Am 30.10.2015 15:31, schrieb Chris Wilson: 30 October 2015 I now have my loading coil running without a matching transformer, as I have very slightly improved my ground. I get a Zmag of 45.6 Ohms, is it worth worrying about? Thanks, a scan is at: http://www.chriswilson.tv/30-10-2015.jpg |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: First of its kind?, DK7FC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: First of its kind?, John Langridge |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Clemens Paul |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Mike Dennison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
