Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? |
| From: | "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:57:16 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Thread-index: | AdETIAq1veNB070UQheNYL3un9h3ZAAE1GzA |
Chris, the point is that your Zmag is identical with Rs,i.e.no reactance (Xs =zero),hence resonance. Virtually perfect match,see Rik's calculations. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Wilson >Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 3:31 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? > >30 October 2015 > > >I now have my loading coil running without a matching transformer, as >I have very slightly improved my ground. I get a Zmag of 45.6 Ohms, is >it worth worrying about? Thanks, a scan is at: > > >http://www.chriswilson.tv/30-10-2015.jpg > > > >-- > > >Best regards, > Chris mailto:[email protected] > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: LF report de F6CNI to 2E0ILY, F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
