To: | Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? |
From: | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:31:41 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A4444C74A@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Organization: | Gatesgarth Developments |
References: | <[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A4444C74A@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Rik, Friday, October 30, 2015 Thanks Rik, I'll not fuss over it then, thanks for the calculations, and thanks to Clemens, too. Have a good weekend! 73 from 2E0ILY > Hi Chris, > > > > I wouldn' worry about that. > > Assuming that you aim at 50 Ohm the SWR will be 1.1/1. > > This will cause a reflected power of 0.2% (or otherwise: a decrease > of 0.01dB of the radiated power). > > > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Clemens Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: LF report de F6CNI to 2E0ILY, Chris Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Clemens Paul |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |