To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Eclipse/137.777 kHz |
From: | pws <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:37:05 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234EF85F@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> |
References: | <4698D0522AFD45F896A41F2D16A2D831@AGB> <BC1061758A4D4230AA9719C22735EBF4@gnat> <19EEF7A6DD30462FA6ACC0F015DC9F52@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234EF85F@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 |
Hi Rik, ... I am not sure thatthe morningdip is relatedto the eclips, the propagation path didn'tcross the eclips line at anytime. ... There's no need that the signal of interest must cross the eclipse line. The ionosphere height is influenced over all paths where the eclipse can be seen. How strong this influences signals depends mainly on the phase difference between ground and sky wave or between the phases from multiple hop propagation. HGA22 is at 1000km of distance from here. That's nearly optimal for this interferometric effects on LF. > ... Looking at the graphs, knowing therewas an eclpis but not knowing when itwas, mybest gues would be14h15. ... Please compare both plots from yesterday and today. There's a clear "W-shape" observable in magnitude around 0945 ut. 73 de df3lp, Peter |
Previous by Date: | LF: monitoring eclipse, "Eberhard v.Wedelstädt" |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Eclipse/137.777 kHz, pws |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Eclipse/137.777 kHz, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Eclipse/137.777 kHz, roelof |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |