Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: Re: WSPR 630m

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: WSPR 630m
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:30:53 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E3aowZsLv7EBvDhEvMRbV2NSISxs0wbfq99z0/Eoon4=; b=oZVrgGIY6cLcQ4zRi+J4/wqdvEk1cOJZZhDbFyGdgnx+Su7/EbV5ZyLscchkfl42QT tz0RsxKtgppmUaDn1xvL0Nv00ERqBPHIAqT4jNkpO01rIuoWxX+GFtO14GT1+B76kjZZ Qw1l0t7kAjL2cVcbRC1Ip3tbTVINh/9AGvNjXFaAI4kEpXtzaGhFQatYnAxHseRczRfc 7JO7oOTKKgEgaFg0L6k9ORx7ftU1X2as3smgT4SlAoa9t8bUzua80tRdewjnyykyXmcV R8z3aqbnKhPo8TdqSNgzokwdc3KJXd7eJL+HE1bQmxjwH9x7XKfjqoTVUKTVdP0GwmaO T9cA==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv: Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
I agree with Clemens (exceptionally ;-) ).
You should be decoded by someone in a range below 200 km. Try in daytime! The groundwave SNR could be better than at night, at least for distances arround 100 km, or over water!
Which antenna current do you get with your 1.3 W ?

73, Stefan

Am 19.02.2015 10:47, schrieb Clemens Paul:
Hi Uwe,

congrats to successfully debugging.
Now it's time to try again today. :-)
Is the antenna properly matched to 50 Ohm?
If so you shold get some spots this evening, even with only with 1.3watts.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of wensauer
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: WSPR 630m

Yes - Dial was one obstacle.
As cw enthusiast, was thinking in "CW".
now I can decod myself and others.
Need mor power and/ or bigger antenna


From: Markus Vester<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 630m

If you receive yourself, wspr(x) will decode and display your
own callsign locally, but the spots won't appear in the
wsprnet database. You could circumvent this by modifying your
callsign in the wsprx setup dialog (eg. something like
DK1KQ/2), but normally this is not very useful.

BTW those unid dashes on 136.7 kHz actually looked a bit like
failed 33% wspr transmissions, except for wrong frequency,
missing modulation, and slightly short.

73, Markus

From: DK7FC<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 6:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 630m

Hi Uwe,

If you can decode other stations, you must of course decode
yourselfe as
well. If not, there is either a time- or frequency shift. You will see
it in the WSPR-waterfall. As a test, disconnect your RX
antenna and look
on your own signal which should be strong enough. It must
appear to the
right time and frequency band.
Maybe you are transmitting 1500 Hz to high? I don't know the
Ultimate 3s
but maybe there is the old problem with that "dial" frequency.
"dial" is
set to 474.200 kHz. Just try that to be sure...

73, Stefan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>