To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: RE: Summer Solstice Test report |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:08:39 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail (test mode) [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1403788203; bh=aLxK5nPDScHHCkeLfmmckBkmUKwCX8WStSuRigj6DW0=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer; b=FjEnqTEG/PmXOgkhHV3WhwsdieDe1YWiteWRqvInIIN86p4cVCi3Ir/js1hxKkvgLRYoQ6YN53rHZVXyRcNgUsCXVstPlmLDkjsrA2OunMGV7YUFnynMBzJI8AWZsYYfP6XpplpjZWmOu71zIV0ucUgVkFwB8jH1ZE9cWQQOtQY= |
References: | <[email protected]>, <3E2191D6995647D48932529876C7636C@gnat> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Mike well at 137 the daytime signal is skywave over about 700km I
watched Budapest (about 1200km) and there is a distinct "dome" in the
response at local noon at mid path. This is higher in summer as the sun is
higher and so stronger. I think on 472 the ground-wave is shorter
particularly at our power and aerial situations, and I suspect the skywave
though there may not be as predominant as at 137. .....more day-time
absorption. I am sure the local environment, trees building etc has an
effect too.
Alan----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 12:43 PM Subject: LF: RE: Summer Solstice Test report On 25 Jun 2014 at 21:55, Alan Melia wrote:It is interesting that there does seem to be a suggestion that 137 holds up better in summer than 472.......have I read that correctly, or maybe it was from another poster. I was not able to do the same sort of tests for 472.I haven't done any scientific tests, but from a lot of monitoring it seems that for daytime ranges around 500-1000km 136kHz works better than 472kHz. I presume this because the 136kHz daytime propagation over this distance is primarily by ground wave, whereas on 472kHz the ground wave range is less so sky-wave is needed and this is not available until dusk. It is difficult to compare the two bands over longer distances because 472kHz is not available in Russia (unlike 136kHz), and activity seems low in many other countries. Personally, I have been disappointed by the amount of DX received during darkness hours on 472kHz so far. It seems commonplace to receive stations out to Scandinavia and Italy, but little beyond. Yes, I have seen some transatlantic DX but nothing to match the stories of worldwide openings reported by retired marine 500kHz operators, or indeed what is availalable routinely on 160m. Is this just lack of activity? de Mike, G3XDV ============ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Summer Solstice Test report, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Summer Solstice Test report, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Summer Solstice Test report, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Summer Solstice Test report, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |