Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 15:25:49 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=910yYbUpvTb1AceNYU8uNyMrxlUTfzknkbUDBGJEkG0=; b=p5xDc/Liyb4TAzxIxMmI3Onv3GrvG6ImjI+iJQu1+n9PIr34U800vfC0y6d4Zld/o7 b2VLzYq8TTy3LC9HTeJKWC8NH1At+VJXdaYwYS4X+fNylnPaz3L9c+d4qWXzYDf4CpVV C7HmnvyBsLMg0i5podqA5Mkj+yUOtMypPnyfBd9U9MnD3YeBTdEpISd0oSNeaPHd12hk 8tcrX6b0AEoqXi4yv9/2g28ngRt7cf4hrotOkrygCK8E/HuN/43X30cMsJObRjrg0IYp hIofyMKQbDn7h8PbbwvoSNOPIWSHD6LJ5y/ufMVPGTcYQlUNX/oWtI4+R/DczQoYs0wx pXmA==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAMFjj716urCthJ-gTaLZB=fxkgyML7GxtFbG=97kchx9mKaHvQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Tnx Albert.
Yes, the signals were fine, congrats. I listened to the file aftrr my first mail.
Yes, in terms of erp we're all QRP stns. I just wanted to confirm for me that QRO power was used here, since it appears that some are actually thinking it can be done with low TX power...

73 from Berlin, Stefan



Am 07.05.2014 12:51, schrieb Albert:
Stefan,

If you take a better look at Bob's QSL card (click to enlarge) you see 2000W tx power. I used abt 400W to get the 5 W erp radiated by the antenna. If you listen to the signal of Bob you will realize that only RRRRR etc was not necessary.
You are right abt using QRP on these bands,  a QRO tx is very useful to get out of the garden. If you consider the erp. we are actually working QRP on these low bands.

73, Albert

     



DK7FC schreef op 7-5-2014 12:19:
Hi,

Aaaaaah so that was QRO, not QRP, right? Or what was the TX power, rather 5W or rather 500W?
And what about Bob, 5W or 500W?
Just to make things clear regarding "QRO is not necessary".
Was it a longer QSO with some content or just "RRRRR 73 73 73 didididadidaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" :-)

73, Stefan



Am 06.05.2014 22:28, schrieb Albert:
All fyi,

I had a CW QSO on 502 kHz with Bob WE2XGR/6 on Feb 9 2010,  04:00 UTC at that time the DX record on CW. On my website (in plane Dutch) a copy of the QSL card and an audio file of the first part of the QSO including a restart of my keyer. My output during the QSO was abt, 5 W erp.

 http://www.pa0a.com/500-khz/

(see: EERSTE QSO NEDERLAND etc.)  for the audio file click left on QSO WE2XGR-6 v3

73, Albert PA0A





Warren Ziegler schreef op 6-5-2014 16:57:
Andy,

   Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW).  
    Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of Bob's ssb signal.
I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall all the details.

73 Warren K2ORS







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>