Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop !

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop !
From: "C. Groeger" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 18:09:18 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
André,
Peut-être tu m'as pas bien compris.
Pourquoi faire du qrss si l'on pourrait faire CW?
J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est très faible...
73, Df5qg

Christian Groeger

André Guyé <[email protected]> schrieb:

>Hi to all.
>
>Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe.
>
>Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also just
>some last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good signal by ears !
>
>I heard also some years ago CW QSO around 507 kHz between local US stations,
>and also between Finbar and VE / W stations. Did you remember about these
>tests ?
>
>Here I have a QRP MF TX, so I cannot play that. But I am sure that any west
>EU station using 10 Watts ERP, can manage again this challenge, when the
>conditions are good.
>
>But my ultimate and main question is : why some years ago there was some
>activity on the old CW MF band from VE / W, and nothing now ?
>
>Andy. F6CNI.
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>From: C. Groeger
>Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:38 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.
>
>Hi Joe!
>5 watts eirp sounds very well!
>Do you plan QRO for your CW?
>I think then really two way CW should be possible over our distance!
>73, df5qg
>
>Christian Groeger
>
>[email protected] schrieb:
>
>>Hi Graham,
>>
>>I couldn't find antthing on modes or BW.  The last LOA for the band
>>didn't specify mode/BW either and was 5 W ERP not EIRP.  Anyway,
>>it's a good day for Canadians and those hoping to work them on 630.
>>
>>The CW beacon will be on again tonight and yours truly will certainly
>>consider requests for skeds!
>>
>>73
>>Joe
>>
>>On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote:
>>
>>> Better late than  never Joe,  just  in time  for the  next  dip  in
>>> solar
>>> activity as well !
>>>
>>> No  mention  of  modes  and  B/W in the  sub  clauses , other  than the 
>>> usual
>>> 'no jam' ?
>>>
>>> 73, G,
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.
>>>
>>>> Hello Group,
>>>>
>>>> For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'm
>>>> happy to report that 472-479 kHz is now available to all Canadian
>>>> amateurs.   Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may
>>>> use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to
>>>> the primary users.  For further info, please see the Industry Canada
>>>> web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10759.html
>>>> which was published online last Thursday 1 May.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Joe VO1NA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>---
>Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce 
>que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
>http://www.avast.com
>
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>