To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop |
From: | Albert <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 06 May 2014 22:28:50 +0200 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <CAMFjj716urCthJ-gTaLZB=fxkgyML7GxtFbG=97kchx9mKaHvQ@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAMFjj716urCthJ-gTaLZB=fxkgyML7GxtFbG=97kchx9mKaHvQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop !, wolf_dl4yhf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Not quite Mid Summer yet Opera 32 on 136 K, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop, Warren Ziegler |
Next by Thread: | Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |