Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2014 00:57:48 -0000
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass (test mode) [email protected]
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1393981098; bh=vw9767AaMHO/ANbW7ddY2spIn2WKJv2SaJ/di27teMo=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer; b=X3OZemCrmIlGD61mc9IGcJ2yYftSlBDeZcLVkfmV2vojU5zk9LRwpmEUy1FGYqvqIuVbEwz2QQDhH66j+64iBMsbVnjFYGS8KS6LsKs4lVTgdjui9xwhCsbaMgl4o0NAhdkOF2jNRk7hudaYBOnWs/xpOPiavDla6x+8Ao3A4dA=
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <D5913D33B88D4449B8F9F4F23A51372E@AGB>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

How about a simple reason........more modes than active operators?
but hey "variety is the spice of life"
Alan
G3NYK (one of the inactive "operators") :-))

----- Original Message -----From: "Graham" <[email protected]>

To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?

Anything that is published about LF/ MF has cq, qrss and beacons asthe main thread
Anyone that  tunes  into  LF/MF  finds   cw,qrss, beacons
Anyone that try's to change direction , is met with a facsimile of agyroscope in precession
Its exciting , wobbles for a while , defies expectations then oncethe input is removed
it regains its  initial orientation ,
And the more the technical input , ie the faster the rotation , themore the resistance to
change ...

G,)




--------------------------------------------------
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 7:38 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?
Hi Steinar,
If no big gun is needed and there is no activity anyway, then there mustbe another reason. Do you have an idea?
73, Stefan

Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have
a big gun.

LA5VNA S

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Steinar Aanesland LF: AW: WSQ2 dead already ?, Marco Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Steinar Aanesland Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Graham Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Alan Melia <= Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Graham LF: AW: WSQ2 dead already ?, Marco Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Steinar Aanesland Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, ing.lindo Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Steinar Aanesland Fwd: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, STEM - Putignano (BA) AW: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Marco

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Graham
Next by Date:	Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Graham
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Graham
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]