| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? |
| From: | Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:15:16 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Hi Domenico You are probably right . I was too quick to draw a conclusion. I really looking forward to It test Wolf's new version. LA5VNA S On 04.03.2014 21:05, ing.lindo wrote: > I guess we are all waiting for "Wolf modifications" at the program.. > BTW, from my side, i will be qrv from tomorrow after carnival celebrations > here in Putignano. > See carnevalediputignano.it > > 73 , Domenico iz7slz > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, ing.lindo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, wolf_dl4yhf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, ing.lindo |
| Next by Thread: | Fwd: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, STEM - Putignano (BA) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |