To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? |
From: | Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:15:16 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Hi Domenico You are probably right . I was too quick to draw a conclusion. I really looking forward to It test Wolf's new version. LA5VNA S On 04.03.2014 21:05, ing.lindo wrote: > I guess we are all waiting for "Wolf modifications" at the program.. > BTW, from my side, i will be qrv from tomorrow after carnival celebrations > here in Putignano. > See carnevalediputignano.it > > 73 , Domenico iz7slz > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, ing.lindo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, wolf_dl4yhf |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, ing.lindo |
Next by Thread: | Fwd: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, STEM - Putignano (BA) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |