Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?

from [Steinar Aanesland] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?
From: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:44:20 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 
Yes, lack of interest

S


On 04.03.2014 20:38, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
> Hi Steinar,
> 
> If no big gun is needed and there is no activity anyway, then there must
> be another reason. Do you have an idea?
> 
> 73, Stefan
> 
> Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
>> Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have
>> a big gun.
>>
>> LA5VNA S
>>
>>
>>    
> 
>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: LF: QRSS 120 on 29.499 starts 2200...and NAA, Bob Raide
Next by Date:  Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, ing.lindo
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]