Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: LF tonite

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite
From: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:02:51 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bIkwhhWgwgSmyh6v0o8hrTku7l9zZQdYBns2Csb+gCY=; b=BdTXtWQKl+Plxc3+d+FftKoFwuDx8UDR9Wb+lWH+S9Hf70xVllIlFiMHcq+YH2HsN9 EY0W9XOSLwZDxfKabkJIvh67z824IcDnWshnaMt9DTEuwgUOulYKwGUO4/MCweN1+I/y rpZVtX4wmM3VqSMhO0/xT3vRKAydpEFsaBsJS8yyLuHb4Ro8GLeF8B5Zy2v+PryrNeaM QxqY6io2mIVpWlEVRmbaIlHOu13c8fCl492lUaZz5uhl+nuMP93/0Vt01q93l26XYx85 BPsBfgVI3gifkNsJadvbzr4Ps6wZW7WAA6jHVyiuKikalsrGol5qbJ2pOo+NHjJSmEh2 8kFA==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Recently a new source of QRM has started here Still trying to find it. On Argo 
it appears as a comb of lines with 50/100Hz spacing. Not even Stefan is 
detectable..

John F5VLF

On 14 Mar 2014, at 06:51CET, Chris Osborn <[email protected]> wrote:

> LF,
> 
> Yes, the LF band appears dead as far as real QSO's are concerned.
> 
> Following Dave G3YXM's RadCom article on LF / MF I beaconed and called CQ on 
> 137.7 kHz extensively for consecutive weekends.
> My signals are not huge but have a range of several hundred km judging from 
> the various grabbers' displays.
> Apart from one CW QSO with Dave on 136.5 kHz I had no other report or reply!
> 
> LF operators are spread far too thinly and unless one makes a sked or 
> advertises well in advance then the chances of a QSO are very slim.
> 
> In the good old days the time for calling / QSO's used to be 'on the hour'.
> It's now probably time to have specific  'day and hour' periods each month 
> for LF activity.
> If we knew that say the second Sunday in each month at 10.00Z would be 
> activity time then maybe a few more ops would dust the cobwebs from their 
> rusty LF rigs.
> 
> 73
> Chris G3XIZ
> 
> 
> On Friday, 14 March 2014, 1:03, Stefan Schäfer 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> LF!
> 
> There's not much activity these days on 137 kHz. I thought i spend the 
> night in good old QRSS-60 on 136.172 kHz.
> 
> Reports welcome :-)
> 
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> 
> 
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>