Alan;
Do you think there will be nights of skywave propagation
as low as 30 kHz? Without it I don't see my .1 w ERP going anywhere
close.
BTW;
I have a BC engineer friend about 30 miles from
here. He could barely hear my fundamental signal and said 60 kHz is
S9 at his QTH.
I measured my second harmonic-appears about -60 db
down- at 58.998.
I will have a 60 kHz clock tomorrow to seen if
any cal trouble right here at transmitter location-Bob
From:
[email protected]To:
[email protected]Date:
Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:12:48 +0000
Subject: Re: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License
WH2XBA
Hi Warren I think the 70kHz "boundary" is just
the point at which the Earth-Ionosphere waveguide supports so many different
modes that the modelling becomes difficult and the ray path is as
effective. Even this transition is fuzzy and is often quoted as low as
50kHz.
It may be of interest that Paul Nicholson has put
a web front end to the LWPC propagation code
http://abelian.org/lwpc/ This gives reasonable results
up to around 45kHz. I have done some tests on it and it gives quite sensible
answers.
Alan
G3NYK
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Saturday, March 01, 2014 3:54 PM
Subject:
Re: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License WH2XBA
Hi Alan,
I agree, there was nothing that I could find that
indicated that there would be a problem at 30kHz. I even checked with a well
known vlf expert who has done design work for some of the BIG military vlf
systems. Somewhere around 70kHz there is a transitional area between
waveguide modes applicable at vlf and ray-tracing which is applicable at
higher frequencies. The increased number of modes above 70kHz I believe
explains the deep fading there as the modes constructively and destructively
interfere.
However, it didn't hurt to ask for the additional
frequencies as Dex was able to use an existing loading coil to get on 45kHz
within hours of the license being issued!
73 Warren K2ORS