Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ
From: schaefer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 01:05:42 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Wolf,

Ah, now i see, it was my misunderstanding, sorry.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 15.02.2014 21:43, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Am 15.02.2014 21:34, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Am 15.02.2014 21:18, schrieb schaefer:
Hi Bob, Wolf, LF,

Am 15.02.2014 20:46, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Hello Bob and all,

It's much easier to put a good sigs out on 472 than 137 or 73.  Countless new modes to use and band conditions much more predictable on 600 meters.

I agree as far as PEP-versus-ERP is concerned.

Hah! Was that a joke?

That wasn't a joke.
That was a comparison of the efficiency of a LF antenna with an MF antenna.

Please explain why you think this is a joke.

Are you seriously saying that generating the same ERP on MF (now listen..) is EASIER THAN ON LF ?

73,
  Wolf .

easier on MF than on LF of course !

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>