Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ
From: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:11:54 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Of course it is easier to generate a more effective  [stronger erp on a shorter wave than one with the same size ant on LF.]
Lot less loading coil on 500 than 137 or 73 to bring ant to resonance.  I am lucky to get 2 w erp from a KW on 73 or maybe 4 watts erp on 137 but I can make nearly 40 W erp on 500 with same  ground system and ant.  Bob
 

Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 21:43:14 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ

Am 15.02.2014 21:34, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Am 15.02.2014 21:18, schrieb schaefer:
Hi Bob, Wolf, LF,

Am 15.02.2014 20:46, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Hello Bob and all,

It's much easier to put a good sigs out on 472 than 137 or 73.  Countless new modes to use and band conditions much more predictable on 600 meters.

I agree as far as PEP-versus-ERP is concerned.

Hah! Was that a joke?

That wasn't a joke.
That was a comparison of the efficiency of a LF antenna with an MF antenna.

Please explain why you think this is a joke.

Are you seriously saying that generating the same ERP on MF (now listen..) is EASIER THAN ON LF ?

73,
  Wolf .

easier on MF than on LF of course !

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>