Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Ant current |
| From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 01 Feb 2014 16:27:28 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
Hello Chris, Am 01.02.2014 16:18, schrieb C. Groeger: Interesting theory.. never thought about that... maybe because the ship's metal body, floating in a highly conductive (saltwater) medium is a better counterpoise than we can dream of, and the direct surroundings around the antenna are conductive but not lossy.Thanks for quick reply, Wolf! But then propagation from a mf tx on a ship on sea should be worse then from land? I remember a suggestion in 'Rothammel's Antennenbuch' to enrich the soil with copper sufate (!) which I certainly don't recommend. Not even pouring kilograms of gritting salt in the garden around the antenna. The experiment would be interesting, but has unwanted side effects ("look what you've done to my pretty flowers"..) ! Cheers, Wolf . |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Ant current, wolf_dl4yhf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: OPERA, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Ant current, C. Groeger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Ant current, Stefan Schäfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |