Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Ant current |
| From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:52:11 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
Hi Chris, By coincidence, I just had to re-adjust the antenna for exactly that reason:The conductivity of water is better, but the 'tangens delta' (loss factor) of water as dielectric is much worse than that of ice. So the water "robs" energy in presence of an E-field, which the ice does not. Thus the losses around the antenna go up. Depends a lot of the greenery around the antenna. Cheers, Wolf DL4YHF . Am 01.02.2014 15:51, schrieb C. Groeger: Hi all How can one explain that ant current rises when soil is frozen? Conductivity of water should be much higher than that of ice. So earth resistance would be higher and the current should drop when soil is frozen... 73, df5qg Christian Groeger |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: LF: 74322 01-02, Bob Raide |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Ant current, wolf_dl4yhf |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Ant current, C. Groeger |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Ant current, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |