Hi Peter,
There has been chaos around 0200utc:
2014-01-19 02:00:12
PPS zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:12
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
2014-01-19 02:00:13
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
2014-01-19 02:00:22 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:22
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
2014-01-19 02:00:23 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:23
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
2014-01-19 02:00:24 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:24 Last
sync too old (delta=3.08 s) !
2014-01-19 02:00:24 Last
sync too old (delta=3.42 s) !
2014-01-19 02:00:25 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:26
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
2014-01-19 02:00:29 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:29
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
2014-01-19 02:00:30 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:31 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:31
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
2014-01-19 02:00:31 Last
sync too old (delta=3.25 s) !
2014-01-19 02:00:32 PPS
zero-crossing too flat
2014-01-19 02:00:32 Last
sync too old (delta=4.27 s) !
2014-01-19 02:00:33
Timestamp didn't pass plausibility check !
I don’t know why. seems most of the satellites where
asleep.
until coming night
Uwe/dj8wx
Von:
[email protected]
Gesendet: 19.01.2014 11:01
An:
[email protected]
Betreff: Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz
Hello Uwe, Markus, VLF
!
I just took a "look
back in time" in my 2012
and 2013 log's (www.qsl.net/pa1sdb)
and I think over the last two years there is a large
rise in signal level
when I take a look at DJ8WX his signal. The trace in some
saved Spectograms in
2012 and 2013 are not that
impressive as they are
right now.
Look at the trace in
the spectogram above.
Impressive !!!
I have to do research if those "glitches" are
at the TX or RX side...
Do you recognise that
glitch at about 2 h Uwe ? (in your
debug log ?)
I'm not at home this
weekend, so I can't tel you the
exact time right now.
73's Peter - PA1SDB
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday,
January 19, 2014 10:01
AM
Subject: Re:
VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz
Hi
Uwe,
great
signal here, better than ever! On my
grabber http://www.df6nm.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm it's
well
visible in 478 uHz, and even traces in the 3.8 mHz "600"
window during
the early morning hours. The SNR would probably have been
sufficient for
an Opds-4H detection, but I'm glad you just left the
carrier on.
I had
fixed my frequency offset and you were spot
on 8270.004, albeit with occasional transmit phase
glitches widening the
42 uHz trace a bit. Sorry about the apparent 0.8 mHz up
shift after around 3
UT, it is an artefact caused by a too narrow setting of
samplerate tracking tolerance (0.2 ppm).
Thanks
very much for this test! It's a pity that
Mal hadn't left his RX on overnight.
Best
73,
Markus
(DF6NM)
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014
10:56 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz
Hi Markus,
just now reading your mail. the switch off time was
some min after you sent it..
sri for that.
now the TX will stay on the
air until tomorrow abt 0900utc.
Hopefully Mal reads this.
GL
Uwe
Von:
[email protected]
Gesendet:
17.01.2014 22:36
An:
[email protected]
Betreff:
VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz
Uwe
is again producing
very good traces on the European grabbers. Even in my
noisy location I am
now getting a nice peak in the 42 uHz FFT
(slightly higher due
to an uncorrected 0.25 mHz error in my frequency
readout).
Uwe, do
you intend
to stay on longer tonight?
Best
73,
Markus
(DF6NM)
