Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations |
| From: | David Hine <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 +0000 (GMT) |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail [email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1390921659; bh=BlGe6LMNOiCc2OqJxCjAU3Uo61GC5WHNr4WF6BZl2+c=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AYptPv8kf3ckP84kOnSDMEJibLGxSXUwBBVjelhHGyPhGqk7PK7EY/iqvGAOY1kQCYPtLoxC1ofbsjQezc8/K8qMQlk2TAyTOsWJ+612ZzTRQDXxUhHszsZ8lIc7cpvRioco3eSQxAucPOzomAX6i5YXL8deHf1kH1QWmCqXJik= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YKn0xFnHayV2jZEUy1LJEUtElsHGTiLOOhhhQ7Dp368pwNIjY+sExQHXxXM+MnJqsvLO+vk+/yLrf6zA+qIbR82HKvequT/FggsEh7lamQynyMWbefLsdXuyXcKaWiuPuP5hI1z5BwGg8XntM1R6rnUw6UQDFjpfOp8S+Mo5TMo=; |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <CAHAQVWNBD=VQ5DiaC1Ac8yn1k+11f+ugzMcoOtp82dZ1iaW8gA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Just use it and experiment! -it is ok as those low frequencies are of no interest to the commercial world, Dave From: g3zjo <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:52 Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations
Hi Roger
On 28/01/2014 14:06, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Its odd isn't it, a case of how you read it. There have been thoughts stated elsewhere recently, personally I don't think it means. Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom, so it is a free for all. It could be. Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom, and so are not protected from interference. Or Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom and never will be. Or Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom and must be kept clear at all times. Or Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom as they are receive only and used for research. More words are needed for clarity, maybe its not specified in order to do keep control of what goes on there, the total opposite of a free for all. 73 Eddie |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Henny in the Netherlands also..., Bob Raide |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Re: LF: 8270.004Hz, PA1SDB, Peter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, g3zjo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, PA1SDB, Peter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |