Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations

from [Stefan Schäfer]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations
From:	Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:17:45 +0100
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
In-reply-to:	<trinity-40b68802-01c0-4f4b-9dfb-3e4e2f388e7e-1390943886815@3capp-gmx-bs07>
References:	<CAHAQVWNBD=VQ5DiaC1Ac8yn1k+11f+ugzMcoOtp82dZ1iaW8gA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <trinity-40b68802-01c0-4f4b-9dfb-3e4e2f388e7e-1390943886815@3capp-gmx-bs07>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Ooooh, this is very intersting! :-)

Does it mean that i can do VLF experiments at e.g. 18 kHz by generatinga VERY distorted 6 kHz signal? The groundwave is at 6 kHz, i.e. below8.3 kHz and i can assume that the 18 kHz harmonic will not causeinterferences to any services operating there!! :-)

Horray!! :-)

When using a resonant antenna, resonated to 18 kHz, i can even optimisethe power losses of the transmitter.

According tohttps://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/fig_02_25a.png weshould try 12 kHz, eheheeem, i mean 4 kHz, wehere propagation should bebest :-)


73, Stefan/DK7FC




Am 28.01.2014 22:18, schrieb LZ:

Dave,

You wrote:

... In other words NO signal must escape that is higher than that 8.3 kHz limit 
-That is it!! -end of!! Dave

No, wrong.
Right: "In other words NO *interfering* signal must escape that is higher than that 
8.3 kHz limit..."

Laura

Gesandt von mein PettiFogPhone

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, (continued) Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, g3zjo Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, David Hine Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, PA1SDB, Peter RE: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Terry GW0EZY [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Roger Lapthorn Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, David Hine Aw: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, LZ Re: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Roger Lapthorn Re: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Markus Vester Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Roger Lapthorn Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Stefan Schäfer <= Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Stefan Schäfer VLF: 8.97/3 kHz test transmissions, Stefan Schäfer Message not available Re: VLF: 8.97/3 kHz test transmissions, jcraig LF: Re: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Chris

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:	LF: Going back to 74.321 QRSS 60 for tonight..., Bob Raide
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Stefan Schäfer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]