To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Aw: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations |
From: | LZ <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:18:06 +0100 (CET) |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Importance: | normal |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAHAQVWNBD=VQ5DiaC1Ac8yn1k+11f+ugzMcoOtp82dZ1iaW8gA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sensitivity: | Normal |
Dave, You wrote: > ... In other words NO signal must escape that is higher than that 8.3 kHz > limit -That is it!! -end of!! Dave No, wrong. Right: "In other words NO *interfering* signal must escape that is higher than that 8.3 kHz limit..." Laura Gesandt von mein PettiFogPhone |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: I am my own boss, g3zjo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: I am my own boss, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, David Hine |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |