Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations

["PA1SDB, Peter" <pa1sdb@amsat.org>]

....the positive part is that;
If you get arrested, because of the allocation regulations law trouble, you are not taken seriously when you say you'r broadcasting at ~8270.000 Hertz and therefore you will not be declared sane :-)

 

 

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: David Hine

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 3:07 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations

Just use it and experiment! -it is ok as those low frequencies are of no interest to the commercial world, Dave

From: g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:52
Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations

Hi Roger

On 28/01/2014 14:06, Roger Lapthorn wrote:

Quoting from the entry in the published UK frequency allocations table:

"Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United

Kingdom"

In the UK I take this to mean ANYONE can operate below 8.3kHz without licence or NoV permits being needed, assuming no interference to services above 8.3kHz.

Its odd isn't it, a case of how you read it. There have been thoughts stated elsewhere recently,  personally I don't think it means.
Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom, so it is a free for all.

It could be.
Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom, and so are not protected from interference.
Or
Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom and never will be.
Or
Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom and must be kept clear at all times.
Or
Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom as they are receive only and used for research.

More words are needed for clarity, maybe its not specified in order to do keep control of what goes on there, the total opposite of a free for all.

73 Eddie