Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.
From: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 22:44:08 -0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz.
Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ?
 
Peter, PA1SDB
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

Hi Peter,
may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had some trouble with it.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv

Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.


Hello Uwe,
I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on 8970,022 Hz ?
 
There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason is something here localy ?????
 
I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that bright part befor A
I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to...
Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz.
 
Wondering why the signal befor mark A was better in relation to B 
 
Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ?
 
 
 
Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB
 
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>