Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

[Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>]

Hi Peter,

Probably your detection on 8969.996 was local QRM since the line appeared and disappeared with the QRM of your battery charger. See the image...

73, Stefan

Am 01.12.2013 23:44, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:

In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz.

Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ?

 

Peter, PA1SDB

 

www.qsl.net/pa1sdb

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM

Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

Hi Peter,
may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had some trouble with it.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv

---

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

---

Hello Uwe,

I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on 8970,022 Hz ?

 

There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason is something here localy ?????

 

I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that bright part befor A

I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to...

Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz.

 

Wondering why the signal befor mark A was better in relation to B 

 

Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ?

 

 

 

Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB