Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection? |
| From: | Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:30:03 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <5C6D6BC04A584E798275EA32CAB71912@White> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<FE3A7DFD6107452292593AFA159E9EC7@White> <[email protected]> <5C6D6BC04A584E798275EA32CAB71912@White> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Am 2013-12-12 22:48, schrieb Markus Vester: Unfortunately 74613 Hz looks a bit noisier here than 614: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz.jpg Markus, I have here not the strong DCF77 noise: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/2013-12-12-2215_74600kHz.jpg74613,5 Hz is looking good in your screenshot. Just above 74614 Hz is a weak Loran line -- 73 Hartmut |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Markus Vester |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Markus Vester |
| Next by Thread: | RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Bob Raide |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
