RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?

[Bob Raide <rjraide@hotmail.com>]

Thanks Terry.  You can manually upload it if you want to but am sure you will get plenty of decodes-Bob
 

---

From: GW0EZY@Sky.com
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:31:13 +0000
Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?

Bob

 

First decode from you at 2300 – forgot to check  “Upload Spots” – hopefully will start reporting more decodes soon.

 

2300  -37   0.1    0.074613    0   WG4XRS        FN12     30

 

73 Terry

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: 12 December 2013 22:35
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?

 

I moved to 13.5 as looks cleanest on Victors dropbox grabber.
 

> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:30:03 +0100
> From: h-wolff@gmx.de
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?
>
> Am 2013-12-12 22:48, schrieb Markus Vester:
> > Unfortunately 74613 Hz looks a bit noisier here than 614: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz.jpg
>
> Markus,
> I have here not the strong DCF77 noise:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/2013-12-12-2215_74600kHz.jpg
>
> 74613,5 Hz is looking good in your screenshot. Just above 74614 Hz is a
> weak Loran line
> --
> 73
> Hartmut
>
>