Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?
From: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:35:23 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<FE3A7DFD6107452292593AFA159E9EC7@White> <[email protected]> <5C6D6BC04A584E798275EA32CAB71912@White>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I moved to 13.5 as looks cleanest on Victors dropbox grabber.
 
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:30:03 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?
>
> Am 2013-12-12 22:48, schrieb Markus Vester:
> > Unfortunately 74613 Hz looks a bit noisier here than 614: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz.jpg
>
> Markus,
> I have here not the strong DCF77 noise:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/2013-12-12-2215_74600kHz.jpg
>
> 74613,5 Hz is looking good in your screenshot. Just above 74614 Hz is a
> weak Loran line
> --
> 73
> Hartmut
>
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>