Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:21:50 +0000
Accept-language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQHOvO3mFgzcqLo2F0eicZYtUg8Rg5nczf4AgAADAYCAACMhSg==
Thread-topic: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany

Hi Bob,

 

you got the call correct ;-)

The main advantage of DFCW (over QRSS) is that at the same dotlength the speed is about 3 times higher, due to the fact that dots and dashed have the same length (see http://www.qsl.net/on7yd/136narro.htm#DFCW).

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 


Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Bob Raide [[email protected]]
Verzonden: zondag 29 september 2013 19:06
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: RE: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany

Stefan;
I notice you always use DFCW.  I also noticed John Andrews does too the last time I saw him on 73.  Yes I think it is easy for me to change.  I use the ON7YD [hope I have his call correct] program and feed my SSB exciter with the laptop with that program and I see it available on his "options" page.  I was going to ask you why you use it.  Now I know and I will try it tonite-Bob
 

Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:55:24 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany

Hello Bob and Hartmut,

My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m band!

Bob, can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m, then DFCW-180 should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may allow reception of your signal even for station with lower RX sensitivity than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since the frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal from random QRM...

73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 29.09.2013 10:23, schrieb Hartmut Wolff:
Bob,

the capture is a bit tiny, because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00. For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better.

73

Hartmut
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>