Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany
From: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:17:30 -0400
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Couldn't do anything without this reflector.  No one knows what the hell is going on without it.  If I see something interesting I go right to it.  Would never know otherwise. 
I never get anything on the yahoo reflector.  I don't know if it gets used[???]  Was very interesting, I tried for a year to get this reflector and never was successful.  I put the word "end" at the end of the message and it was done!  I must have sent 50 times to try to join.  Always same message that they would get back to me with an answer and never hear anything!
 

Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:08:43 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany

PS: Even QRSS-60 is more promising than WSPR-15 for initial experiments. So the simple modes are still the right way to go.

PPS: I find a small part of this quick success is also due to the existence of this reflecor which helps to motivate active (RX or TX) LF/MF/VLF radio amateurs to motivate each other  :-)

73, Stefan

Am 29.09.2013 18:55, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Hello Bob and Hartmut,

My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m band!

Bob, can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m, then DFCW-180 should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may allow reception of your signal even for station with lower RX sensitivity than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since the frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal from random QRM...

73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 29.09.2013 10:23, schrieb Hartmut Wolff:
Bob,

the capture is a bit tiny, because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00. For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better.

73

Hartmut
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>