Hi Stefan,

when I said "we" in my previous email, I was referring to VK amateurs.
That makes "you" the European amateurs. :-)

I don't have any suggestions. I will give it a bit of thought, and
consult with the other VK stations and get back to you.

73, Dimtris


2013/2/18 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>:
> Same message, updated subject.
>
> Am 17.02.2013 23:39, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
>
> Hi Dimitris,
>
> Thanks for the informations.
> Well, if 475.7 kHz is not a good choice due to QRM in VK, then "we" should
> discuss where to go.
>
> "We", that must be explained. I think that "we" are those active stations
> who either want to try to receive a station from VK or want to try to get a
> decode in VK.
>
> Of course i would like to join those active TX stations on MF and i like to
> try if i can leave a trace or decode, not only in the sand :-) I thought
> about running QRSS-10 near 476.170 kHz, as done in the last months. This
> would allow me to run the TX during the complete possible time, arround
> 15:30...18:00. Or, alternatively, i would like to run WSPR-2 in 100% TX
> mode. That would at least require splitted RX and TX bands on both sides,
> otherwise there will be complaints. There will be complaints anyway, im
> afraid...
>
> So maybe it would be an idea to define a special slot just for this path and
> time and active (RX and TX) stations so they can all run WSPR-2 in 100%
> mode. Of course there must be stations who are RXing exclusively but there
> are only a few who will TX anyway.
>
> Any recommendations / ideas? Should we discuss in direct emails including
> all those from VK who are not member of this group?
>
> I would start the MF experiment tomorrow.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC