I have a better  idea

G..

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dimitrios Tsifakis" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 11:25 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Plans for 630m RX-TX experiments from EU to VK and VK to EU

Hi Stefan,

when I said "we" in my previous email, I was referring to VK amateurs.
That makes "you" the European amateurs. :-)

I don't have any suggestions. I will give it a bit of thought, and
consult with the other VK stations and get back to you.

73, Dimtris


2013/2/18 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>:

Same message, updated subject.

Am 17.02.2013 23:39, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:

Hi Dimitris,

Thanks for the informations.

Well, if 475.7 kHz is not a good choice due to QRM in VK, then "we" should

discuss where to go.

"We", that must be explained. I think that "we" are those active stations

who either want to try to receive a station from VK or want to try to get a

decode in VK.

Of course i would like to join those active TX stations on MF and i like to

try if i can leave a trace or decode, not only in the sand :-) I thought
about running QRSS-10 near 476.170 kHz, as done in the last months. This
would allow me to run the TX during the complete possible time, arround
15:30...18:00. Or, alternatively, i would like to run WSPR-2 in 100% TX
mode. That would at least require splitted RX and TX bands on both sides,
otherwise there will be complaints. There will be complaints anyway, im
afraid...

So maybe it would be an idea to define a special slot just for this path and

time and active (RX and TX) stations so they can all run WSPR-2 in 100%

mode. Of course there must be stations who are RXing exclusively but there

are only a few who will TX anyway.

Any recommendations / ideas? Should we discuss in direct emails including
all those from VK who are not member of this group?

I would start the MF experiment tomorrow.

73, Stefan/DK7FC