Hi Roger and Graham,
thanks the the replies, I have now changed my TX power to +27dBm. The
efficiency of the antenna is not constant, as the Rloss changes after
a rain, but at least +27dBm is closer to the real radiated power than
+47dBm was :-)
Roger, I have changed the link to your transverter design as requested.
73, Dimitris
2013/2/6 Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>:
> Dimitris,
>
> On LF and MF where the EIRP is very much lower than the RF power output from
> the transmitter, the accepted protocol is to specify EIRP in the WSPR
> database.
>
> Incidentally, please will you change the links on your website to the G3XBM
> 472kHz transverter design? I have moved my pages and the 472kHz transverter
> page is now at https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp3/mflf/472khz_tvtr .
> The older page, although currently accessible, will not be public for much
> longer.
>
> Today I also added my 137kHz TX transverter schematic at
> https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp3/mflf/137khz_tvrtr . This latter
> design is still a "work in progress" and this is the circuit as it is today.
>
> 73s
> Roger G3XBM
>
>
>
>
> On 5 February 2013 22:22, Dimitrios Tsifakis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi group,
>>
>> I was browsing the WSPR database for MF and noticed that I am the only
>> one declaring a 50 W power. My TX power output is 50 W, however the
>> radiate power is just a tiny fraction of 1 W. What is the protocol for
>> WSPR? Advertise the Pout or the EIRP?
>>
>> 73, Dimitris VK1SV
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
> http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
> https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
> http://qss2.blogspot.com/
> http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM
>
|
