Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: declared power on WSPR |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:01:34 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <CAKvcm2f8+iLxf5VeN6LQ3LSefevnuFvt0o1RD=G1U32dJjh=yQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <CAKvcm2es=Zhf-LRz4vSF2mnNXTFJm0XYHyB8EK-x2hW7Fu8UDA@mail.gmail.com> <72D88C6C0DAA4B379CBBCA695EF47BF0@White> <9C06F775D1344822B5D30EBBAB8AA144@AGB> <CAKvcm2f8+iLxf5VeN6LQ3LSefevnuFvt0o1RD=G1U32dJjh=yQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Dimitris, Am 06.02.2013 00:18, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: [...] A reason for the discrepancy between different "1 W" values may be that the majority of amateurs would calculate rather than measure the radiated power. And as we all know, the majority of back-yard antennas are not quite lab reference antennas. If anything, I would guess that calculated radiated power is overestimated compared to reality. 73, Dimitris Yes, that's the reason :-) 73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m, Stefan Schäfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: declared power on WSPR, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: declared power on WSPR, Dimitrios Tsifakis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: declared power on WSPR, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |