To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Listened on 472 kHz |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:07:54 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <C2FC4802CC5340E08216E5D4304F85EC@White> <[email protected]> <op.wqv3d8rrv16t3f@xn----rfameuhquf> <[email protected]> <38A1BD13AFC54D08B573B87510889DBD@standard9dmup1> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hello Petr, Am 14.01.2013 16:09, schrieb Petr Maly: Thanks all for your responses.I still recall my activity on 136kHz some 13 yrs ago, therefore I was a bit disappointed now. Obviously, I will have to stay overnight in my distant and rough QTH next time!73, Petr, OK1FIG It is a nice and silent location, not to bad to stay there. But i hope you have a heater :-) As long as you have no local stations in a range of 300 km it is certainly better to try to receive something after your local sunset. Personally i found that the conds are much better (also in terms of local QRM) after 21 UTC. Unfortunately many station go QRT just to this time... Another advantage of WSPR ;-) We can make a sked on 630m if you like! What is your TX system? 73, Stefan/DK7FC |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Listened on 472 kHz, Petr Maly |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Listened on 472 kHz, Walter Staubach |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Listened on 472 kHz, Petr Maly |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Listened on 472 kHz, Walter Staubach |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |