happy to test it here
Jim VE1JF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Taylor" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400
Hi Laurence, Steinar, and all,
On 12/17/2012 5:15 PM, Laurence KL1 X wrote:
Steinar I was getting some reasonable syncs but appeared not
stable enough - so that confirms it :-) Laurence KL 1 X
LA5VNA wrote:
Thanks Tobias. The conclusion is clear , my system in NOT stable enough
when using JT9-10. Pity , but that's life ;(
Please send me an example of a JT9-10 file that seems like it should
have decoded, but did not. NOBODY has yet done so. I am reasonably
sure that small amounts of frequency drift can be detected and
adequately compensated in software... but I can't do it without some
typical examples.
If you know it, it will help to have, along with the file, the message
that was being transmitted.
Note to all: I am presently working on a version or WSPR that will allow
transmissions of length 10 (or 15?) and 30 minutes, with other features
like the traditional WSPR. Sensitivity should be as good as the WSPR-8
and WSPR-32 tests made by Marcus (and others).
-- 73, Joe, K!JT
|
