Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: Re: M0BMU mods to the G0MRF PA

from [Stefan Schäfer] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: M0BMU mods to the G0MRF PA
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 02:10:18 +0100
In-reply-to: <001f01cddb10$64a50b30$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <CAMFjj723AN8YQa1yKot=6QTTBkaXH_0e-8u3O+O-u_=t1BU2dw@mail.gmail.com> <A5AC7825ED8A4E66BAA0582EB736B87D@GaryAsus> <001f01cddb10$64a50b30$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Mal,

Am 15.12.2012 23:06, schrieb mal hamilton:
Gary
I see you only wind on half the ferrite core whereas I spread the turns symetrically around the whole circumference.
In my case I need 8 turns on Prim es 24 on Sec.
I first wind the 24 turns around the circumference evenly then the 8 tunrns on top also evenly. This works for me.
I wonder if there is any real difference in efficiency

Yes, using the whole circumference is better, especially when the core is driven close to saturation. Also the AL value from the datasheet for a certain core assumes a homogen spread of the turns.


Warren,

Yes, of course you can make taps on the secondary side. I'm doing this in my MF matchbox, using a 6 pole switch. This allows to rise the power in 3 dB steps...

73, Stefan/DK7FC


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: M0BMU mods to the G0MRF PA, Warren Ziegler
Next by Date:  LF: WSPR TA, Albert W
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: Re: M0BMU mods to the G0MRF PA, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  LF: WSPR TA, Albert W
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]