To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: JT9-2 |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:41:30 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <E27FA30B33EA4BA186717B3B2B6B1D50@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Tobias, Am 13.11.2012 23:26, schrieb Tobias DG3LV:Yes, many users have no timing problems in the latest JT9 versions but there are still many users left, who do have timing problems! In WSPR, no one has timing problems, as long as a time server program is used. I never ever observed timing problems in WSPR... Obviously the decoder is very critical against a time delay. This seems not to be relatives by the mode (1,2,5,10,30). For example i saw several non decodes at UA0SNV, having 10 sync points and realistic SNR showings but no text was displayed. However there was one decode showing my message. This is the current situation...[...]I do not have timing problems at WSJT-X despite my SDR has long latencies.73, Stefan/DK7FC |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: LF WSPR overnight, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: JT9-2, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: LF WSPR overnight, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: LF WSPR overnight, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |