Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 K

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 KHz :)
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:53:08 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1351119385; bh=E46RoSWuk3n1MHzgHFKw7Fk3v2PuBdQajZf97JNxluM=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=x4KOae3eFgEC6ddUoU/Ogs75EjOyiWORLLUI7GFw0R0wieQ4ILG0AB3ibfg9cnMNQ ACC7rfqrI8bztCrUDdECGO3quQj0XavbAEzmf7zVM5EaLYTKoOhDQ/wdlNhweb6e0e M5poufqvrSc1tEDHfI1bUiXYJHZPRbFY/01e8D10=
Importance: Normal
References: <4084B089A7FF496CAC1CE9A2459B9C47@AGB> <7E9EB5FA653147298EEBB4676DCDD9DD@White> <3DD7F0DC19984F7CBF611D59430EEFA3@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Graham,
 
similar...? WSPR decodes reliably at -29 dB, Op-2 requires -23 dB. Both SNR figures are referenced to carrier power vs noise in 2.5 kHz. Op-8 would be equivalent in sensitivity but takes four times as long, and also conveys less data.
 
In an optical subcarrier system, FSK will be no more difficult to implement than ASK. And no average power is being saved by using 50% duty cycle.
 
Regarding the over the air comparison, please review the comment from PA0A, pasted beneath.
 
Sorry, but some statements just don't become more true by repeating them again and again... 
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 
From: Albert
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: LF: DUAL BEACON WSPR + OPERA 500Khz

Graham,

Regarding your dual mode 500 kHz tests yesterday. For me the absolute winner is WSPR, when Opera stopped to decode, due to QSB, WSPR continued with decodes at least 3 to 4 dB deeper into the noise.

73, Albert PA0A


From: Graham
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 KHz :)

What's  you  measured  error  ? ..taking  one  is  peak  and one  is  average  and  the  beach mark is  different  as well,  direct  read-out testing  is not  satisfactory. 
 
Over a live  radio  path  the  statement  is reasonably  correct  , op2  may  on the  + side  and  op4  on the  - side 
I think the  statement is  technically  correct, however , the  differences in the  calibration  and  method  do  present  a  technical quandary .
 
Similar   =   having a resemblance in appearance, character, or quantity, without being identical:
 
In parallel  transmission test  over  25  miles  on  500 k , the  two  modes  randomly  decoded at and  around the  same  level
 
However system implementation  is the key  , simplicity  of use , with  minimal  hardware requirements.  as can be  seen on the  136  band , many  stations  are  using  the  system with  some  very  good  results , hopefully  for  field   work  with  optical  systems  it  will  give a reliable  lap-top based  SDR   measuring  system .  
 
73 -G..
 
 

Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 KHz :)

From: Graham
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:18 PM
Subject: LF: OPERA OPTICAL BEACON (way off topic) but is based on 17 KHz :)

...

> and OP2  has  similar  sensitivity as  the  wspr  system.

...

 

this is definitely not true.
 
73, Markus
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>